Friday, February 07, 2014

When should leaders abandon their principles?

Along with many of my fellow Torontonians (and comedians everywhere) I follow via the media the latest on our mayor, Rob Ford. Let's put aside his policies and deeds to date, and focus instead on his recent announcement that as he cannot change who he is (“I can’t change who I am”), he will continue to refuse to attend the city's Pride parade.

When should a leader stick to their principles, and when should they cut their losses and embrace change?

One can argue that Rob Ford made no secret of his personal views on Pride in his pre-mayoral career as a city councillor. He fulminated against special interest groups, and decried the antics of the parade's revellers. So citizens who voted for him knew what they were buying, and his steadfast refusal to change those ingrained views demonstrate an adherence to his principles.

On the other hand, when he assumed the city's reins as leader and manager in chief, he accepted the obligation to represent all citizens, and not just his followers.

In corporate life, sometimes CEOs need to accept that their vision may not be the right one for their company. CEOs can draw upon a number of sources to retain best advice: their executive team, the board of directors, and perhaps a select number of peers they trust. Ultimately, however, the decision for which strategic path to pursue is their alone. That's why they get the job.

And ultimately, if that path turns out to be the wrong one, the CEO, and no-one else, is accountable for the results. It takes a special kind of person to be humble enough to realize that their direction is leading the company into murky waters, and to change direction.